Grounded Theory Methodology: Positivism, Hermeneutics, and Pragmatism

Authors

Lars-Johan Age, Stockholm School of EconomicsFollow

Abstract

Glaserian grounded theory methodology, which has been widely adopted as a scientific methodology in recent decades, has been variously characterised as "hermeneutic" and "positivist." This commentary therefore takes a different approach to characterising grounded theory by undertaking a comprehensive analysis of: (a) the philosophical paradigms of positivism, hermeneutics, and pragmatism; and (b) the general philosophical questions of the aims of science and the issue of choosing a scientific methodology. The commentary then seeks to position grounded theory methodology in terms of these philosophical perspectives. The study concludes that grounded theory methodology contains elements of positivism, hermeneutics, and pragmatism. In coming to this conclusion, the study clarifies the degree to which these three perspectives are found within Glaserian grounded theory methodology.

Keywords

Grounded Theory, Positivism, Hermeneutics, Pragmatism

Publication Date

11-1-2011

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License.

DOI

10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1319

Recommended APA Citation

Age, L. (2011). Grounded Theory Methodology: Positivism, Hermeneutics, and Pragmatism. The Qualitative Report, 16(6), 1599-1615. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2011.1319